Is the statement true that a forwarder should select the NVOCC that pays higher compensation if the shipper does not incur extra costs?

The statement addresses a forwarder's decision-making process when selecting a Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (NVOCC). It's important for forwarders to consider multiple elements beyond just financial compensation when choosing an NVOCC, even if the shipper is not incurring any extra costs.

Selecting an NVOCC solely based on who pays higher compensation could overlook crucial considerations such as service reliability, shipping schedules, the NVOCC's compliance with regulations, and the overall quality of service. These factors can have significant implications for the shipment's success, potentially impacting delivery times, customer satisfaction, and risk management.

In this context, while compensation is an essential aspect of the decision-making process, it should not be the only criterion. Thus, the notion that a higher compensation without additional shipper costs is the sole reason for selecting an NVOCC simplifies a complex decision and fails to account for the broader implications and responsibilities of freight forwarding.